You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
fMRI in translation: the challenges facing real-world applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.3389/neuro.09.063.2009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephan Schleim |
| Abstract |
Functional neuroimaging has increased our understanding of human brain function tremendously and has become a standard tool in clinical and cognitive neuroscience research. We briefly review its methodological foundations and describe remaining challenges for translational research. The application of neuroimaging results to individual subjects, for example in predicting treatment response or determining the veracity of a statement, is limited by these challenges, in particular by the anatomical and statistical procedures commonly employed. We thus argue for sincere caution in the translation of functional neuroimaging to real-world applications. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 6 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 34 | 24% |
| Unknown | 10 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 46 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 24% |
| Unknown | 16 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2020.
All research outputs
#596,217
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#272
of 7,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,131
of 163,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.