↓ Skip to main content

PyMVPA: A Unifying Approach to the Analysis of Neuroscientific Data

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
319 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PyMVPA: A Unifying Approach to the Analysis of Neuroscientific Data
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, February 2009
DOI 10.3389/neuro.11.003.2009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Hanke, Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Per B. Sederberg, Emanuele Olivetti, Ingo Fründ, Jochem W. Rieger, Christoph S. Herrmann, James V. Haxby, Stephen José Hanson, Stefan Pollmann

Abstract

The Python programming language is steadily increasing in popularity as the language of choice for scientific computing. The ability of this scripting environment to access a huge code base in various languages, combined with its syntactical simplicity, make it the ideal tool for implementing and sharing ideas among scientists from numerous fields and with heterogeneous methodological backgrounds. The recent rise of reciprocal interest between the machine learning (ML) and neuroscience communities is an example of the desire for an inter-disciplinary transfer of computational methods that can benefit from a Python-based framework. For many years, a large fraction of both research communities have addressed, almost independently, very high-dimensional problems with almost completely non-overlapping methods. However, a number of recently published studies that applied ML methods to neuroscience research questions attracted a lot of attention from researchers from both fields, as well as the general public, and showed that this approach can provide novel and fruitful insights into the functioning of the brain. In this article we show how PyMVPA, a specialized Python framework for machine learning based data analysis, can help to facilitate this inter-disciplinary technology transfer by providing a single interface to a wide array of machine learning libraries and neural data-processing methods. We demonstrate the general applicability and power of PyMVPA via analyses of a number of neural data modalities, including fMRI, EEG, MEG, and extracellular recordings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 319 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 21 7%
France 6 2%
Germany 5 2%
Netherlands 4 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 268 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 84 26%
Researcher 79 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 29 9%
Student > Master 26 8%
Professor 17 5%
Other 51 16%
Unknown 33 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 88 28%
Neuroscience 44 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 13%
Computer Science 28 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 6%
Other 38 12%
Unknown 60 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2013.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#597
of 833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,369
of 185,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.