↓ Skip to main content

Computational Morphometry for Detecting Changes in Brain Structure Due to Development, Aging, Learning, Disease and Evolution

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computational Morphometry for Detecting Changes in Brain Structure Due to Development, Aging, Learning, Disease and Evolution
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, August 2009
DOI 10.3389/neuro.11.025.2009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Mietchen, Christian Gaser

Abstract

The brain, like any living tissue, is constantly changing in response to genetic and environmental cues and their interaction, leading to changes in brain function and structure, many of which are now in reach of neuroimaging techniques. Computational morphometry on the basis of Magnetic Resonance (MR) images has become the method of choice for studying macroscopic changes of brain structure across time scales. Thanks to computational advances and sophisticated study designs, both the minimal extent of change necessary for detection and, consequently, the minimal periods over which such changes can be detected have been reduced considerably during the last few years. On the other hand, the growing availability of MR images of more and more diverse brain populations also allows more detailed inferences about brain changes that occur over larger time scales, way beyond the duration of an average research project. On this basis, a whole range of issues concerning the structures and functions of the brain are now becoming addressable, thereby providing ample challenges and opportunities for further contributions from neuroinformatics to our understanding of the brain and how it changes over a lifetime and in the course of evolution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Germany 2 1%
Netherlands 2 1%
Austria 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 137 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 22%
Researcher 28 18%
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 25 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 12%
Neuroscience 17 11%
Engineering 17 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 10%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 33 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2018.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#532
of 833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,985
of 123,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.