↓ Skip to main content

In-group and out-group membership mediates anterior cingulate activation to social exclusion

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In-group and out-group membership mediates anterior cingulate activation to social exclusion
Published in
Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience, April 2009
DOI 10.3389/neuro.18.001.2009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Austen Krill, Steven M Platek

Abstract

FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING WAS EMPLOYED TO EXAMINE SENSITIVITY TO SOCIAL EXCLUSION IN THREE CONDITIONS: same-race, other-race, and self-resembling faces. The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), specifically the dorsal ACC, has been targeted as a key substrate in the physical and social pain matrix and was hypothesized to regulate activation response to various facial conditions. We show that participants demonstrated greatest ACC activation when being excluded by self-resembling and same-race faces, relative to other-race faces. Additionally, participants expressed greater distress and showed increased ACC activation as a result of exclusion in the same-race condition relative to the other-race condition. A positive correlation between implicit racial bias and activation in the amygdala was also evident. Implicit attitude about other-race faces partly explains levels of concern about exclusion by out-group individuals. These findings suggest that individuals are more distressed and their brain (i.e. neural alarm system) responds with greater activation when being excluded by individuals whom they are more likely to share group membership with.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Netherlands 2 1%
Japan 2 1%
Italy 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 165 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 22%
Researcher 28 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Professor 15 8%
Other 46 25%
Unknown 15 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 87 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 9%
Social Sciences 16 9%
Neuroscience 15 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 7%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 26 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2022.
All research outputs
#16,048,318
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience
#28
of 35 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,164
of 107,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.3. This one scored the same or higher as 7 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.