You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
KIBRA: A New Gateway to Learning and Memory?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.3389/neuro.24.004.2010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Armin Schneider, Matthew J. Huentelman, Joachim Kremerskothen, Kerstin Duning, Robert Spoelgen, Karoly Nikolich |
| Abstract |
The genetic locus encoding KIBRA, a member of the WWC family of proteins, has recently been shown to be associated with human memory performance through genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism screening. Gene expression analysis and a variety of functional studies have further indicated that such a role is biologically plausible for KIBRA. Here, we review the existing literature, illustrate connections between the different lines of evidence, and derive models based on KIBRA's function(s) in the brain that can be further tested experimentally. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 8 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 125 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 20% |
| Researcher | 27 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Professor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 30% |
| Psychology | 18 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 11% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2024.
All research outputs
#16,031,414
of 25,352,304 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#3,783
of 5,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,153
of 176,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#22
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,352,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.