You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Decision-Making Process in Female Genital Mutilation: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3390/ijerph17103362 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Angi Alradie-Mohamed, Russell Kabir, S.M. Yasir Arafat |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2023.
All research outputs
#5,343,131
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
#8,729
of 31,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,939
of 420,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
#389
of 1,233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.