You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gender-Based Differences by Age Range in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19: A Spanish Observational Cohort Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Medicine, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3390/jcm10050899 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claudia Josa-Laorden, Anxela Crestelo-Vieitez, María Del Mar García Andreu, Manuel Rubio-Rivas, Marcos Sánchez, Neera Toledo Samaniego, Francisco Arnalich Fernández, Rosario Iguaran Bermudez, Eva Ma Fonseca Aizpuru, Juan Antonio Vargas Núñez, Paula Maria Pesqueira Fontan, Jorge Serrano Ballesteros, Santiago Jesús Freire Castro, Melani Pestaña Fernández, Alba Viana García, Victoria Nuñez Rodriguez, Vicente Giner-Galvañ, Francisco Javier Carrasco Sánchez, Almudena Hernández Milián, Marta Cobos-Siles, Jose Javier Napal Lecumberri, Virginia Herrero García, Maria de Los Reyes Pascual Pérez, Jesús Millán Núñez-Cortés, José Manuel Casas Rojo, On Behalf Of The Semi-Covid-Network |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 16 | 33% |
| Chile | 13 | 27% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Serbia | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 20% |
| Unknown | 40 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 37 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2022.
All research outputs
#535,906
of 24,907,378 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Medicine
#260
of 14,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,513
of 425,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Medicine
#14
of 959 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,907,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 959 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.