You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risk Factors for Difficult Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation. The PIVV2 Multicentre Case-Control Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Medicine, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3390/jcm9030799 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miguel Angel Rodriguez-Calero, Joan Ernest de Pedro-Gomez, Luis Javier Molero-Ballester, Ismael Fernandez-Fernandez, Catalina Matamalas-Massanet, Luis Moreno-Mejias, Ian Blanco-Mavillard, Ana Belén Moya-Suarez, Celia Personat-Labrador, José Miguel Morales-Asencio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 13 | 72% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 28% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 31 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 38% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 32 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,608,572
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Medicine
#641
of 12,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,826
of 365,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Medicine
#48
of 548 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 548 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.