You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predictors of Global Non-Motor Symptoms Burden Progression in Parkinson’s Disease. Results from the COPPADIS Cohort at 2-Year Follow-Up
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Personalized Medicine, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3390/jpm11070626 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diego Santos-García, Teresa de Deus, Carlos Cores, Hector Canfield, Jose M Paz González, Cristina Martínez Miró, Lorena Valdés Aymerich, Ester Suárez, Silvia Jesús, Miquel Aguilar, Pau Pastor, Lluis Planellas, Marina Cosgaya, Juan García Caldentey, Nuria Caballol, Ines Legarda, Jorge Hernández-Vara, Iria Cabo, Lydia López Manzanares, Isabel González Aramburu, Maria A Ávila Rivera, Maria J Catalán, Victor Nogueira, Victor Puente, Julio Dotor, Carmen Borrué, Berta Solano, Maria Álvarez Sauco, Lydia Vela, Sonia Escalante, Esther Cubo, Francisco Carrillo, Juan C Martínez Castrillo, Pilar Sánchez Alonso, Gemma Alonso, Nuria López Ariztegui, Itziar Gastón, Jaime Kulisevsky, Marta Blázquez, Manuel Seijo, Javier Rúiz Martínez, Caridad Valero, Monica Kurtis, Oriol de Fábregues, Jessica Ardura, Ruben Alonso, Carlos Ordás, Luis M López Díaz, Darrian McAfee, Pablo Martinez-Martin, Pablo Mir, COPPADIS Study Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 50% |
| Japan | 1 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Librarian | 3 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 20% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 10% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,985,052
of 25,342,911 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Personalized Medicine
#234
of 3,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,318
of 435,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Personalized Medicine
#18
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,342,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.