You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Use of Different Food Classification Systems to Assess the Association between Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Cardiometabolic Health in an Elderly Population with Metabolic Syndrome (PREDIMED-Plus Cohort)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrients, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3390/nu13072471 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Celia Martinez-Perez, Rodrigo San-Cristobal, Pilar Guallar-Castillon, Miguel Ángel Martínez-González, Jordi Salas-Salvadó, Dolores Corella, Olga Castañer, Jose Alfredo Martinez, Ángel M. Alonso-Gómez, Julia Wärnberg, Jesús Vioque, Dora Romaguera, José López-Miranda, Ramon Estruch, Francisco J. Tinahones, José Lapetra, Lluis Serra-Majem, Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas, Josep A. Tur, Vicente Martín Sánchez, Xavier Pintó, José J. Gaforio, Pilar Matía-Martín, Josep Vidal, Clotilde Vázquez, Emilio Ros, Maira Bes-Rastrollo, Nancy Babio, Jose V. Sorlí, Camille Lassale, Beatriz Pérez-Sanz, Jessica Vaquero-Luna, María Julia Ajejas Bazán, María Concepción Barceló-Iglesias, Jadwiga Konieczna, Antonio García Ríos, María Rosa Bernal-López, José Manuel Santos-Lozano, Estefanía Toledo, Nerea Becerra-Tomás, Olga Portoles, María Dolores Zomeño, Itziar Abete, Anai Moreno-Rodriguez, Oscar Lecea-Juarez, Stephanie K. Nishi, Júlia Muñoz-Martínez, José M. Ordovás, Lidia Daimiel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 10 | 32% |
| China | 3 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 131 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 21% |
| Unknown | 56 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 62 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,458,971
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Nutrients
#3,635
of 19,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,408
of 427,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrients
#152
of 896 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 896 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.