↓ Skip to main content

Does Consumption of Ultra-Processed Foods Matter for Liver Health? Prospective Analysis among Older Adults with Metabolic Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrients, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
46 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does Consumption of Ultra-Processed Foods Matter for Liver Health? Prospective Analysis among Older Adults with Metabolic Syndrome
Published in
Nutrients, October 2022
DOI 10.3390/nu14194142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jadwiga Konieczna, Miguel Fiol, Antoni Colom, Miguel Ángel Martínez-González, Jordi Salas-Salvadó, Dolores Corella, María Trinidad Soria-Florido, J. Alfredo Martínez, Ángel M. Alonso-Gómez, Julia Wärnberg, Jesús Vioque, José López-Miranda, Ramon Estruch, M. Rosa Bernal-López, José Lapetra, Lluís Serra-Majem, Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas, Josep A. Tur, Vicente Martín Sánchez, Xavier Pintó, José J. Gaforio, Pilar Matía-Martín, Josep Vidal, Clotilde Vázquez, Lidia Daimiel, Emilio Ros, Maira Bes-Rastrollo, María Pascual, Jose V. Sorlí, Albert Goday, María Ángeles Zulet, Anai Moreno-Rodriguez, Francisco Jesús Carmona González, Rafael Valls-Enguix, Juana M. Janer, Antonio Garcia-Rios, Rosa Casas, Ana M. Gomez-Perez, José Manuel Santos-Lozano, F. Javier Basterra-Gortari, María Ángeles Martínez, Carolina Ortega-Azorin, Joan Bayó, Itziar Abete, Itziar Salaverria-Lete, Miguel Ruiz-Canela, Nancy Babio, Lourdes Carres, Dora Romaguera

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Master 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 28 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 29 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 135. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#299,276
of 24,981,585 outputs
Outputs from Nutrients
#927
of 20,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,054
of 433,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrients
#23
of 962 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,981,585 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 962 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.