You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Laparoscopic Versus an Open Colectomy in an Emergency Setting: A Case-Controlled Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Coloproctology, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3393/ac.2013.29.1.12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frederick H. Koh, Ker-Kan Tan, Charles B. Tsang, Dean C. Koh |
| Abstract |
Laparoscopy continues to be increasingly adopted for elective colorectal resections. However, its role in an emergency setting remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes between laparoscopic and open colectomies performed for emergency colorectal conditions. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 30% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 63% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |