You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Time to rethink the capture and use of family history in primary care
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, November 2016
|
DOI | 10.3399/bjgp16x688273 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paul A Nathan, Owen Johnson, Susan Clamp, Jeremy C Wyatt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 40% |
Australia | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 17% |
Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
Researcher | 3 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 5 | 28% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,650,352
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,843
of 4,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,507
of 417,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#37
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.