You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalence of Erectile Dysfunction in Male Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cross-Sectional Studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp20x714197 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Damiano Pizzol, Tao Xiao, Lee Smith, Guillermo F López Sánchez, Andrea Garolla, Christopher Parris, Yvonne Barnett, Petre Cristian Ilie, Pinar Soysal, Jae Il Shin, Mark A Tully, Lin Yang, Nicola Veronese, Igor Grabovac |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 50% |
| Italy | 1 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 83% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2022.
All research outputs
#6,364,643
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,116
of 4,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,328
of 504,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#66
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.