↓ Skip to main content

Recent trends in diagnostic techniques for inflammatory bowel disease

Overview of attention for article published in The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recent trends in diagnostic techniques for inflammatory bowel disease
Published in
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, April 2015
DOI 10.3904/kjim.2015.30.3.271
Pubmed ID
Authors

Makoto Naganuma, Naoki Hosoe, Takanori Kanai, Haruhiko Ogata

Abstract

Although ileocolonoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease and is useful for assessing the disease severity in the colon and terminal ileum, several alternative diagnostic techniques have been developed recently. For ulcerative colitis (UC), magnification colonoscopy, endocytoscopy, and confocal laser endomicroscopy enable assessment of histological inflammation without the need for biopsy. Capsule endoscopy is useful for detection of small intestinal and colonic lesions in both female and male patients. For UC, capsule endoscopy may be useful for evaluating colonic inflammation in patients with a previous poor colonoscopy experience, while it should be used only in Crohn's disease (CD) patients with unexplained symptoms when other examinations are negative. Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) is particularly useful for detecting transmural inflammation, stenosis, and extraintestinal lesions, including abscesses and fistulas. MRE is also useful when evaluating small and large intestinal lesions, even in cases with severe strictures in which full evaluation of the small bowel would be virtually impossible using other devices. Therefore, the appropriate diagnostic devices for detecting CD lesions in the small and large intestine should be used.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 24%
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Other 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Librarian 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 12 24%