You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic research review of observational approaches used to evaluate mother-child mealtime interactions during preschool years 2–3
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3945/ajcn.114.092114 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heidi Bergmeier, Helen Skouteris, Marion Hetherington |
| Abstract |
The family meal and social interactions during the meal are important events in a child's life. Specifically, mealtime interactions have been linked to child weight status, the development of children's eating patterns, and socialization. Mealtime interactions may be observed and evaluated to provide insights into this important event beyond self-reported measurements. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
| India | 1 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 247 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 9% |
| Researcher | 16 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 65 | 26% |
| Unknown | 49 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 61 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 19% |
| Psychology | 33 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Unknown | 57 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2016.
All research outputs
#2,574,230
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#3,910
of 12,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,587
of 276,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#39
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.