↓ Skip to main content

Program director and resident perspectives of a competency-based medical education anesthesia residency program in Canada: a needs assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Korean Journal of Medical Education, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Program director and resident perspectives of a competency-based medical education anesthesia residency program in Canada: a needs assessment
Published in
Korean Journal of Medical Education, February 2016
DOI 10.3946/kjme.2016.20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sylvain Boet, Ashlee-Ann E. Pigford, Viren N. Naik

Abstract

In July 2015, the University of Ottawa will introduce a competency-based medical education (CBME) postgraduate program for anesthesia. Prior to program implementation, this study aimed to identify (1) Canadian anesthesiology program directors perceptions of CBME, and (2) residents' opinion on how the program should be designed and perceived consequences of CBME. This two-phase, qualitative study included semi-structured interviews with Canadian anesthesia program directors (Phase I) and a focus group interview with residents enrolled in the University of Ottawa time-based anesthesia program (Phase II). Both phases sought to gauge participant's perceptions of CBME. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed. Data was combined to protect anonymity of the six participants (three program directors, three residents). Participants spoke about the perceived advantages of CBME, the need to establish definitions, and challenges to a CBME program highlighting logistical factors, implications for trainees and the role assessment plays in CBME. These findings will inform CBME implementation strategies in anesthesia programs across the country, and may assist other residency programs in the design of their programs. Furthermore, our findings may help identify potential challenges and issues that other post-graduate specialties may face as they transition to a CBME model.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 12%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Postgraduate 8 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 18 24%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 43%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 18 24%