↓ Skip to main content

Spinal versus general anesthesia for Cesarean section in patients with sickle cell anemia

Overview of attention for article published in Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spinal versus general anesthesia for Cesarean section in patients with sickle cell anemia
Published in
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, September 2015
DOI 10.4097/kjae.2015.68.5.469
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohamed H. Bakri, Eman A. Ismail, Gamal Ghanem, Mahmoud Shokry

Abstract

Sickle cell anemia (SCA) increases the rate of maternal and fetal complications. This pilot study was designed to compare the maternal and fetal outcomes of spinal versus general anesthesia (GA) for parturients with SCA undergoing cesarean delivery. Forty parturients with known SCA scheduled for elective Cesarean delivery were randomized into spinal anesthesia (n = 20) and GA groups (n = 20). Perioperative hemodynamic parameters were recorded. Postpartum complications were followed up. Opioid consumption was calculated. Blood loss during surgery and the number of patients who received intraoperative or postpartum blood transfusion were recorded. Patient satisfaction with the type of anesthesia was assessed. The Apgar score at 1 and 5 min, neonatal admission to the intensive care unit, and mortality were also recorded. Blood loss was significantly higher in the GA than spinal group (P = 0.01). However, the number of patients who received an intraoperative or postpartum blood transfusion was statistically insignificant. Significantly more patients developed intraoperative hypotension and bradycardia in the spinal than GA group. Opioid use during the first 24 h was significantly higher in the GA than spinal group (P < 0.0001). More patients had vaso-occlusive crisis in the GA than spinal group without statistical significance (P = 0.4). There was one case of acute chest syndrome in the GA group. No significant differences were observed in postoperative nausea and/or vomiting, patient satisfaction, or hospital length of stay. Neonatal Apgar scores were significantly better in the spinal than GA group at 1 and 5 min (P = 0.006 and P = 0.009, respectively). Neonatal intensive care admission was not significantly different between the two groups, and there was no neonatal mortality. Spinal anesthesia may have advantages over GA in parturients with SCA undergoing Cesarean delivery.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Other 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 16 23%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 26 38%