↓ Skip to main content

The use of EMLA cream reduces the pain of skin puncture associated with caudal block in children

Overview of attention for article published in Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The use of EMLA cream reduces the pain of skin puncture associated with caudal block in children
Published in
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, March 2016
DOI 10.4097/kjae.2016.69.2.149
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eun Kyung Choi, YoungHo Ro, Sung-Sik Park, Ki-bum Park

Abstract

Caudal block is a popular regional anesthesia in children undergoing infraumbilical surgeries including inguinal hernia repair and orchiopexy. We evaluated the efficacy of eutectic mixture of local anesthetic (EMLA) cream for reducing needle insertion pain during caudal block in pediatric patients. Forty-one children between the ages of 13 months and 5 years undergoing infraumbilical surgery were randomized to receive either topical EMLA or placebo cream over the sacral hiatus one hour before caudal block. All children were assessed with the Multidimensional Assessment Pain Scale (MAPS) at the following time points. T0: arrival at the operation room; T1: just before needle insertion; T2: immediately after needle insertion into the sacral hiatus. The need for sevoflurane inhalation due to procedural pain response was also assessed at the same time as MAPS assessment. MAPS scores were significantly lower in the EMLA group compared with the placebo group at T2 (P = 0.001). Moreover, need for sevoflurane inhalation due to procedural pain response was significantly lower in the EMLA group compared with the control group at T2 (P < 0.001). We suggest that pretreatment with EMLA cream over the sacral hiatus before caudal block has significant advantages in alleviating procedure pain during caudal block in children.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 4 10%
Lecturer 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 15 38%