↓ Skip to main content

East Asian Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study of Docetaxel and Ramucirumab Versus Docetaxel and Placebo in the Treatment of Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Following…

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Research and Treatment : Official Journal of Korean Cancer Association, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
East Asian Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study of Docetaxel and Ramucirumab Versus Docetaxel and Placebo in the Treatment of Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Following Disease Progression after One Prior Platinum-Based Therapy (REVEL)
Published in
Cancer Research and Treatment : Official Journal of Korean Cancer Association, February 2016
DOI 10.4143/crt.2015.401
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keunchil Park, Joo-Hang Kim, Eun Kyung Cho, Jin-Hyoung Kang, Jin-Yuan Shih, Annamaria Hayden Zimmermann, Pablo Lee, Ekaterine Alexandris, Tarun Puri, Mauro Orlando

Abstract

REVEL demonstrated improved overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) with docetaxel + ramucirumab vs. docetaxel + placebo in 1253 intent-to-treat (ITT) stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with disease progression following platinum-based chemotherapy. Results from the East Asian subgroup analysis are reported. Subgroup analyses were performed in the East Asian ITT population (n=89). Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed for OS and PFS, and the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was performed for response rate. In docetaxel + ramucirumab (n=43) vs. docetaxel + placebo (n=46), median OS was 15.44 months vs. 10.17 months (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.762, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.444-1.307), median PFS was 4.88 months vs. 2.79 months (HR: 0.658, 95% CI: 0.408-1.060), and ORR was 25.6% (95% CI: 13.5-41.2) vs. 8.7% (95% CI: 2.4-20.8). Due to increased incidence of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia in East Asian patients, starting dose of docetaxel was reduced for newly enrolled East Asian patients (75 to 60 mg/m(2), n=24). In docetaxel + ramucirumab vs. docetaxel + placebo, incidence of neutropenia was 84.4% vs. 72.7% (75 mg/m(2)) and 54.5% vs. 38.5% (60 mg/m(2)). Incidence of febrile neutropenia was 43.8% vs. 12.1% (75 mg/m(2)) and 0 vs. 7.7% (60 mg/m(2)). Results of this subgroup analysis showed a trend favoring ramucirumab + docetaxel for median OS, PFS, and improved ORR in East Asian patients, consistent with ITT population results. Reduction of starting dose of docetaxel in East Asian patients was associated with improved safety.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 19%
Student > Master 8 17%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 13 28%