↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Necitumumab Plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in East Asian Patients with Stage IV Squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Subgroup…

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Research and Treatment : Official Journal of Korean Cancer Association, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Necitumumab Plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in East Asian Patients with Stage IV Squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Subgroup Analysis of the Phase 3, Open-Label, Randomized SQUIRE Study
Published in
Cancer Research and Treatment : Official Journal of Korean Cancer Association, January 2017
DOI 10.4143/crt.2016.423
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keunchil Park, Eun Kyung Cho, Maximino Bello, Myung-Ju Ahn, Sumitra Thongprasert, Eun-Kee Song, Victoria Soldatenkova, Henrik Depenbrock, Tarun Puri, Mauro Orlando

Abstract

The phase 3 randomized SQUIRE study revealed significantly longer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for necitumumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (neci+GC) than for gemcitabine and cisplatin alone (GC) in 1093 patients with previously untreated advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This post hoc subgroup analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of neci+GC among East Asian (EA) patients enrolled in the study. All patients received up to six 3-week cycles of gemcitabine (Days 1, 8; 1250 mg/m²) and cisplatin (Day 1; 75 mg/m²). Patients in the neci+GC arm also received necitumumab (Days 1, 8; 800 mg) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were estimated from stratified Cox proportional hazards models. In EA patients, there were improvements for neci+GC (n=43) vs GC (n=41) in OS (HR: 0.805, 95% CI: 0.484-1.341) and PFS (HR: 0.720, 95% CI: 0.439-1.180), consistent with the results for non-EA patients observed in the present study. The overall safety data were consistent between EA and non-EA patients. A numerically higher proportion of patients experienced serious adverse events (AEs), Grade ≥3 AEs, and AEs with an outcome of death for (i) neci+GC vs GC in EA patients and (ii) EA patients vs non-EA patients for neci+GC. Although limited by the small sample size and post hoc nature of the analysis, these findings are consistent with those of the overall study and suggest that neci+GC offers a survival advantage and favorable benefit/risk for EA patients with advanced squamous NSCLC.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Researcher 5 15%
Other 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 32%