↓ Skip to main content

Redefining the Positive Circumferential Resection Margin by Incorporating Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Treatment Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Validation Study

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Research and Treatment : Official Journal of Korean Cancer Association, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Redefining the Positive Circumferential Resection Margin by Incorporating Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Treatment Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Validation Study
Published in
Cancer Research and Treatment : Official Journal of Korean Cancer Association, May 2017
DOI 10.4143/crt.2016.607
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joo Ho Lee, Eui Kyu Chie, Seung-Yong Jeong, Tae-You Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Sun Young Kim, Ji Yeon Baek, Hee Jin Chang, Min Ju Kim, Sung Chan Park, Jae Hwan Oh, Sung Hwan Kim, Jong Hoon Lee, Doo Ho Choi, Hee Chul Park, Sung-Bum Kang, Jae-Sung Kim

Abstract

This study was conducted to validate the prognostic influence of treatment response among patients with positive circumferential resection margin for locally advanced rectal cancer. Clinical data of 197 patients with positive circumferential resection margin defined as ≤ 2mm after preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision between 2004 and 2009 were collected for this multicenter validation study. All patients underwent median 50.4Gy radiation with concurrent fluoropyrimidine based chemotherapy. Treatment response was dichotomized to good response, including near total and moderate regression, and poor response, including minimal and no regression. After 52 months median follow-up, five-year overall survival (OS) for good responders and poor responders was 79.1% and 48.4%, respectively (p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, circumferential resection margin involvement and treatment response were a prognosticator for overall survival and locoregional recurrence free survival. In subgroup analysis, good responders with close margin showed significantly better survival outcomes for survival. Good responders with involved margin and poor responders with close margin shared similar results, whereas poor responders with involved margin had worst survival (5 year OS, 81.2%, 57.0%, 50.0%, and 32.4%, respectively, p<0.001). Among patients with positive circumferential resection margin after pre-operative chemoradiotherapy, survival of the good responders was significantly better than poor responders. Subgroup analysis revealed that definition of positive circumferential resection margin may be individualized as involvement for good responders, whereas ≤ 2 mm for poor responders.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 17%
Other 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 8 44%