↓ Skip to main content

Review of Cohort Studies for Mood Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Psychiatry Investigation, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Review of Cohort Studies for Mood Disorders
Published in
Psychiatry Investigation, May 2016
DOI 10.4306/pi.2016.13.3.265
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong Jin Jeon, Ji Hyun Baek, Yong-Min Ahn, Joo Kim, Tae Hyun Ha, Boseok Cha, Eunsoo Moon, Hee-Ju Kang, Vin Ryu, Chul-Hyun Cho, Jung-Yoon Heo, Kiwon Kim, Heon-Jeong Lee, Mood Disorders Cohort Research Consortium Group

Abstract

This paper aimed to review currently available cohort studies of subjects with mood disorders such as major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD). Using the PubMed and KoreaMed databases, we reviewed eight major cohort studies. Most studies recruited participants with MDD and BD separately, so direct comparison of factors associated with diagnostic changes was difficult. Regular and frequent follow-up evaluations utilizing objective mood ratings and standardized evaluation methods in a naturalistic fashion are necessary to determine detailed clinical courses of mood disorders. Further, biological samples should also be collected to incorporate clinical findings in the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. An innovative cohort study that can serve as a platform for translational research for treatment and prevention of mood disorders is critical in determining clinical, psychosocial, neurobiological and genetic factors associated with long-term courses and consequences of mood disorders in Korean patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 12 25%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 38%
Psychology 6 13%
Neuroscience 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 12 25%