| Title |
Metacognition and the spacing effect: the role of repetition, feedback, and instruction on judgments of learning for massed and spaced rehearsal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Metacognition and Learning, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11409-012-9090-3 |
| Authors |
Jessica M. Logan, Alan D. Castel, Sara Haber, Emily J. Viehman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| South Africa | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 189 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 43 | 22% |
| Unknown | 40 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 47 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 30 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 45 | 23% |
| Unknown | 49 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2012.
All research outputs
#15,207,446
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from Metacognition and Learning
#126
of 232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,384
of 174,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metacognition and Learning
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.