↓ Skip to main content

The effect of plyometric training on distance running performance

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, December 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
36 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
314 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
681 Mendeley
Title
The effect of plyometric training on distance running performance
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, December 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00421-002-0741-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert W. Spurrs, Aron J. Murphy, Mark L. Watsford

Abstract

Previous research has reported that plyometric training improves running economy (RE) and ultimately distance-running performance, although the exact mechanism by which this occurs remains unclear. This study examined whether changes in running performance resulting from plyometric training were related to alterations in lower leg musculotendinous stiffness (MTS). Seventeen male runners were pre- and post-tested for lower leg MTS, maximum isometric force, rate of force development, 5-bound distance test (5BT), counter movement jump (CMJ) height, RE, VO(2max), lactate threshold (Th(la)), and 3-km time. Subjects were randomly split into an experimental (E) group which completed 6 weeks of plyometric training in conjunction with their normal running training, and a control (C) group which trained as normal. Following the training period, the E group significantly improved 3-km performance (2.7%) and RE at each of the tested velocities, while no changes in VO(2max) or Th(la) were recorded. CMJ height, 5BT, and MTS also increased significantly. No significant changes were observed in any measures for the C group. The results clearly demonstrated that a 6-week plyometric programme led to improvements in 3-km running performance. It is postulated that the increase in MTS resulted in improved RE. We speculate that the improved RE led to changes in 3-km running performance, as there were no corresponding alterations in VO(2max) or Th(la).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 681 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 <1%
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 659 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 126 19%
Student > Master 120 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 12%
Researcher 38 6%
Student > Postgraduate 38 6%
Other 133 20%
Unknown 145 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 338 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 45 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 5%
Social Sciences 11 2%
Other 46 7%
Unknown 169 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2023.
All research outputs
#700,890
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#197
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#963
of 136,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.