↓ Skip to main content

Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Medicine, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
711 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
805 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies
Published in
Psychological Medicine, April 2010
DOI 10.1017/s0033291710000772
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. Cuijpers, T. Donker, A. van Straten, J. Li, G. Andersson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 805 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 8 <1%
Sweden 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Dominican Republic 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 775 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 147 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 141 18%
Researcher 105 13%
Student > Bachelor 103 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 60 7%
Other 133 17%
Unknown 116 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 458 57%
Medicine and Dentistry 74 9%
Social Sciences 41 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 3%
Computer Science 14 2%
Other 52 6%
Unknown 144 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,003,369
of 24,929,945 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Medicine
#504
of 5,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,994
of 101,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Medicine
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,929,945 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.