You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Psychological Medicine, April 2010
|
DOI | 10.1017/s0033291710000772 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
P. Cuijpers, T. Donker, A. van Straten, J. Li, G. Andersson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
Sweden | 1 | 11% |
Finland | 1 | 11% |
United States | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 806 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | <1% |
Sweden | 4 | <1% |
Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
Spain | 3 | <1% |
United States | 3 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Dominican Republic | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | <1% |
Unknown | 776 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 147 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 141 | 17% |
Researcher | 105 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 103 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 60 | 7% |
Other | 134 | 17% |
Unknown | 116 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 458 | 57% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 41 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 3% |
Computer Science | 14 | 2% |
Other | 53 | 7% |
Unknown | 144 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,003,369
of 24,929,945 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Medicine
#504
of 5,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,994
of 101,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Medicine
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,929,945 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.