↓ Skip to main content

MRM3-based LC-MS multi-method for the detection and quantification of nut allergens

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
MRM3-based LC-MS multi-method for the detection and quantification of nut allergens
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00216-016-9888-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robin Korte, Jens Brockmeyer

Abstract

Food allergies have become a global challenge to food safety in industrialized countries in recent years. With governmental monitoring and legislation moving towards the establishment of threshold allergen doses, there is a need for sensitive and quantitative analytical methods for the determination of allergenic food contaminants. Targeted proteomics employing liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) has emerged as a promising technique that offers increased specificity and reproducibility compared to antibody and DNA-based technologies. As the detection of trace levels of allergenic food contaminants also demands excellent sensitivity, we aimed to significantly increase the analytical performance of LC-MS by utilizing multiple reaction monitoring cubed (MRM(3)) technology. Following a bottom-up proteomics approach, including a straightforward sample preparation process, 38 MRM(3) experiments specific to 18 proteotypic peptides were developed and optimized. This permitted the highly specific identification of peanut, almond, cashew, hazelnut, pistachio, and walnut. The analytical performance of the method was assessed for three relevant food matrices with different chemical compositions. Limits of detection were around 1 μg/g or below in fortified matrix samples, not accounting for the effects of food processing. Compared to an MRM-based approach, the MRM(3)-based method showed an increase in sensitivity of up to 30-fold. Regression analysis demonstrated high linearity of the MRM(3) signal in spiked matrix samples together with robust intersample reproducibility, confirming that the method is highly applicable for quantitative purposes. To the best of our knowledge, we describe here the most sensitive LC-MS multi-method for food allergen detection thus far. In addition, this is the first study that systematically compares MRM(3) with MRM for the analysis of complex foods. Graphical abstract Allergen detection by MRM(3).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Other 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 18%
Chemistry 8 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 19 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,261,756
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#1,975
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,420
of 347,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#28
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.