↓ Skip to main content

Ambient particulate air pollution and acute lower respiratory infections: a systematic review and implications for estimating the global burden of disease

Overview of attention for article published in Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 505)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
202 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
Title
Ambient particulate air pollution and acute lower respiratory infections: a systematic review and implications for estimating the global burden of disease
Published in
Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11869-011-0146-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sumi Mehta, Hwashin Shin, Rick Burnett, Tiffany North, Aaron J. Cohen

Abstract

Acute lower respiratory infections (ALRI) account for nearly one fifth of mortality in young children worldwide and have been associated with exposures to indoor and outdoor sources of combustion-derived air pollution. A systematic review was conducted to identify relevant articles on air pollution and ALRI in children. Using a Bayesian approach to meta-analysis, a summary estimate of 1.12 (1.03, 1.30) increased risk in ALRI occurrence per 10 μg/m(3) increase in annual average PM2.5 concentration was derived from the longer-term (subchronic and chronic) effects studies. This analysis strengthens the evidence for a causal relationship between exposure to PM2.5 and the occurrence of ALRI and provides a basis for estimating the global attributable burden of mortality due to ALRI that is not influenced by the wide variation in regional case fatality rates. Most studies, however, have been conducted in settings with relatively low levels of PM2.5. Extrapolating their results to other, more polluted, regions will require a model that is informed by evidence from studies of the effects on ALRI of exposure to PM2.5 from other combustion sources, such as secondhand smoke and household solid fuel use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Canada 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Unknown 243 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 18%
Researcher 42 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 53 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 52 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 51 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Engineering 9 4%
Other 48 19%
Unknown 70 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,176,817
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health
#26
of 505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,611
of 127,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.