Can we test for hereditary cancer at 18 years when we start surveillance at 25? Patient reported outcomes.
So far Altmetric has seen 29 tweets from 27 accounts with an upper bound of 40,007 combined followers.

My 2nd article! Can we test for hereditary cancer at 18 years when we start surveillance at 25? Read the answer here:

Woooohoooo! M'n zusje heeft haar tweede publicatie binnen :D

Why should we test for hereditary cancer at age 18 when we start cancer surveillance at 25? #FamCa

Geographical breakdown
The data shown in this map were compiled from user activity on Twitter.
# Country As %
1 NL 33%
2 AE 11%
3 FR 3%
3 SA 3%
3 US 3%
3 GB 3%
7 Other 40%
Tweeter demographics
Type Count As %
Members of the public 21 77%
Scientists 4 14%
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) 2 7%
What's this page for?

It pulls together some of the online activity around this article. It is maintained by Altmetric. We collect relevant information from social media sites, blogs, newspapers, magazines and more.

Having one place where you can see all of the comments on or shares of an article makes it easier to see what others think of the work.

To help you put the data in context we've given the article an Altmetric score, which is our measure of the quality & quantity of online attention that it has received. The scoring algorithm is relatively straightforward and takes things like the relative reach of different data sources into account.

Note that the Altmetric score can't tell you anything about the quality of the article though reading through the different tabs might.

Can I be alerted if anybody mentions this paper?

Yes. If you'd like to be alerted when somebody shares or discusses this paper then you can sign up for email alerts.

You can do this for more than one paper. Alerts are sent out once a day if and only if there has been some activity around one of the papers you want to watch.

You've missed a news story, who can I speak to?

If you're waiting for a tweet or blog post to appear then give it a day: we try to pick up mentions as quickly as possible but it can take some time to process all of the information we collect, especially at peak times.

If more than a day has passed then please fill in this form - it'll go to our support team who will take a look and get back to you as soon as possible.

You can also reach out on Twitter to @altmetric.

The Altmetric score is one measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that this article has received. You can read about how Altmetric scores are calculated here.

This article scored 18.55

The context below was calculated when this article was last mentioned on 1st September 2013

Compared to all articles in Fam Cancer
So far Altmetric has tracked 108 articles from this journal. They typically receive a little less attention than average, with a mean score of 3.1 vs the global average of 4.9. This article has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers. It's actually the 2nd highest scoring article in this journal that we've seen so far.
In the
All articles of a similar age
Older articles will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this score to the 80,912 tracked articles that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any journal. This article has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
In the
Other articles of a similar age in Fam Cancer
We're also able to compare this article to 21 articles from the same journal and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This article has done very well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
In the
All articles
More generally, Altmetric has tracked 2,398,451 articles across all journals so far. Compared to these this article has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all articles ever tracked by Altmetric.
In the
Score in context
Is one of the highest ever scores in this journal (ranked #2 of 108)
show more...
Mentioned by
Readers on
2 Mendeley
0 CiteULike
Track this article