You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Revisiting the Functional Properties of Self-Efficacy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Management, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1177/0149206313490027 |
Authors |
Gillian B. Yeo, Andrew Neal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 20% |
Poland | 1 | 7% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 7% |
Belgium | 1 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
Scientists | 3 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 3% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Greece | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 169 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 27% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 13% |
Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 8% |
Lecturer | 14 | 8% |
Other | 43 | 24% |
Unknown | 19 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Business, Management and Accounting | 62 | 34% |
Psychology | 36 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 30 | 16% |
Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
Arts and Humanities | 4 | 2% |
Other | 20 | 11% |
Unknown | 26 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2016.
All research outputs
#4,568,537
of 25,282,542 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Management
#761
of 1,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,256
of 201,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Management
#16
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,282,542 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.