↓ Skip to main content

The Ambulatory Long-Block: An Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Educational Innovations Project (EIP)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
The Ambulatory Long-Block: An Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Educational Innovations Project (EIP)
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11606-008-0588-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric J. Warm, Daniel P. Schauer, Tiffiny Diers, Bradley R. Mathis, Yvette Neirouz, James R. Boex, Gregory W. Rouan

Abstract

Historical bias toward service-oriented inpatient graduate medical education experiences has hindered both resident education and care of patients in the ambulatory setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Nepal 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 58 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 10 16%
Researcher 7 11%
Other 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Other 16 26%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 54%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 12 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,406,676
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,998
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,327
of 84,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#38
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.