| Title |
Combined effects of low-intensity blood flow restriction training and high-intensity resistance training on muscle strength and size
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-011-1873-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tomohiro Yasuda, Riki Ogasawara, Mikako Sakamaki, Hayao Ozaki, Yoshiaki Sato, Takashi Abe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Isle of Man | 1 | 13% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 528 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 520 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 101 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 87 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 8% |
| Researcher | 36 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 5% |
| Other | 91 | 17% |
| Unknown | 140 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 175 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 62 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 5% |
| Unknown | 159 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,754,422
of 25,378,284 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,293
of 4,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,565
of 119,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#17
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.