You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome Editing in Animals
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7128-2 |
| ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7127-5, 978-1-4939-7128-2
|
| Editors |
Izuho Hatada |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 24% |
| France | 2 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Russia | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 76% |
| Scientists | 5 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 32 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 38 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,275,558
of 24,323,943 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#364
of 13,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,357
of 428,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#53
of 1,076 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,323,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,696 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,076 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.