| Title |
Food Classification Systems Based on Food Processing: Significance and Implications for Policies and Actions: A Systematic Literature Review and Assessment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Obesity Reports, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13679-014-0092-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean-Claude Moubarac, Diana C. Parra, Geoffrey Cannon, Carlos A. Monteiro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| South Africa | 1 | 8% |
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Egypt | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 598 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 594 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 98 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 68 | 11% |
| Researcher | 53 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 5% |
| Other | 79 | 13% |
| Unknown | 197 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 89 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 84 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 65 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 30 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 3% |
| Other | 88 | 15% |
| Unknown | 223 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2024.
All research outputs
#887,863
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Current Obesity Reports
#68
of 427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,390
of 238,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Obesity Reports
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.