| Title |
Effects of Low-Volume High-Intensity Interval Training (HIT) on Fitness in Adults: A Meta-Analysis of Controlled and Non-Controlled Trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sports Medicine, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40279-014-0180-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew Weston, Kathryn L. Taylor, Alan M. Batterham, Will G. Hopkins |
| Abstract |
Low-volume high-intensity interval training (HIT) appears to be an efficient and practical way to develop physical fitness. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 141 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 29 | 21% |
| United States | 11 | 8% |
| Spain | 10 | 7% |
| Australia | 9 | 6% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| South Africa | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 2 | 1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 57 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 73 | 52% |
| Scientists | 56 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 798 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 779 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 155 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 144 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 101 | 13% |
| Researcher | 51 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 40 | 5% |
| Other | 163 | 20% |
| Unknown | 144 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 334 | 42% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 109 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 52 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 2% |
| Other | 62 | 8% |
| Unknown | 182 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 170. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2023.
All research outputs
#240,176
of 25,554,853 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#220
of 2,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,899
of 241,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#10
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,554,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.