↓ Skip to main content

Early Adolescents’ Peer Experiences with Ethnic Diversity in Middle School: Implications for Academic Outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Early Adolescents’ Peer Experiences with Ethnic Diversity in Middle School: Implications for Academic Outcomes
Published in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10964-017-0697-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jakeem Amir Lewis, Adrienne Nishina, Alysha Ramirez Hall, Shannon Cain, Amy Bellmore, Melissa R. Witkow

Abstract

As the U.S. becomes increasingly ethnically diverse, opportunities for cross-ethnic interaction at school may be increasing, and these interactions may have implications for academic outcomes for both ethnic minority and White youth. The current study examines how cross-ethnic peer relationships, measured using peer nominations for acceptance and daily lunchtime interactions, relate to academic outcomes for an ethnically diverse sample of 823 (45% boys and 55% girls; M age  = 11.69) public middle school sixth graders across one Midwestern and two Western states. For White, Black, Asian, Latino/a, and Multiethnic students, self-reported daily cross-ethnic peer interactions were associated with higher end-of-year GPAs in core academic courses and teachers' expectations for educational attainment, but not self-reported school aversion. Making cross-ethnic acceptance nominations was not associated with any academic outcomes. Thus, daily opportunities for cross-ethnic interactions may be important school experiences for early adolescents.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 15%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 27%
Social Sciences 13 19%
Unspecified 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 23 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2017.
All research outputs
#579,384
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#98
of 1,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,746
of 317,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#1
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.