↓ Skip to main content

Meat consumption: Trends and quality matters

Overview of attention for article published in Meat Science, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
370 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
860 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Meat consumption: Trends and quality matters
Published in
Meat Science, July 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.06.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maeve Henchion, Mary McCarthy, Virginia C. Resconi, Declan Troy

Abstract

This paper uses quality theory to identify opportunities for the meat sector that are consistent with trends in meat consumption. Meat consumption has increased and is likely to continue into the future. Growth is largely driven by white meats, with poultry in particular of increasing importance globally. The influence of factors such as income and price is likely decline over time so that other factors, such as quality, will become more important. Quality is complex and consumers' quality expectations may not align with experienced quality due to misconception of certain intrinsic cues. Establishing relevant and effective cues, based on extrinsic and credence attributes, could offer advantage on the marketplace. The use of extrinsic cues can help convey quality characteristics for eating quality, but also for more abstract attributes that reflect individual consumer concerns e.g. health/nutrition, and collective concerns, e.g. sustainability. However, attributes are not of equal value to all consumers. Thus consumer segmentation and production differentiation is needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 860 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 853 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 199 23%
Student > Bachelor 129 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 10%
Researcher 61 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 3%
Other 115 13%
Unknown 237 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 234 27%
Environmental Science 44 5%
Social Sciences 41 5%
Engineering 35 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 34 4%
Other 185 22%
Unknown 287 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,538,708
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Meat Science
#541
of 1,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,720
of 242,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Meat Science
#16
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.