Cellular Heterogeneity
Humana Press, New York, NY
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cellular Heterogeneity
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Methods in molecular biology, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7680-5 |
| ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7679-9, 978-1-4939-7680-5
|
| Editors |
Natasha S. Barteneva, Ivan A. Vorobjev |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 15% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Austria | 2 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 74% |
| Scientists | 7 | 26% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 25% |
| Researcher | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 35% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 15% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,394,244
of 24,541,341 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#150
of 13,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,254
of 338,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#1
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,541,341 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,810 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.