You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The cost‐effectiveness of primary care for Indigenous Australians with diabetes living in remote Northern Territory communities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Journal of Australia, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.5694/mja13.11316 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susan L Thomas, Yuejen Zhao, Steven L Guthridge, John Wakerman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 26% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#651,619
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Medical Journal of Australia
#362
of 5,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,896
of 242,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Journal of Australia
#2
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.