You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The cost‐effectiveness of primary care for Indigenous Australians with diabetes living in remote Northern Territory communities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Journal of Australia, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.5694/mja13.11316 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susan L Thomas, Yuejen Zhao, Steven L Guthridge, John Wakerman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 25% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#638,423
of 25,832,559 outputs
Outputs from Medical Journal of Australia
#351
of 5,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,651
of 243,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Journal of Australia
#2
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,832,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.