Title |
Comparing the effects of sun exposure and vitamin D supplementation on vitamin D insufficiency, and immune and cardio-metabolic function: the Sun Exposure and Vitamin D Supplementation (SEDS) Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-015-1461-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mica Hartley, Samuel Hoare, Fiona E Lithander, Rachel E Neale, Prue H Hart, Shelley Gorman, Peter Gies, Jill Sherriff, Ashwin Swaminathan, Lawrence J Beilin, Trevor A Mori, Laura King, Lucinda J Black, Kushani Marshall, Fan Xiang, Candy Wyatt, Kerryn King, Terry Slevin, Nirmala Pandeya, Robyn M Lucas |
Abstract |
Adults living in the sunny Australian climate are at high risk of skin cancer, but vitamin D deficiency (defined here as a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration of less than 50 nmol/L) is also common. Vitamin D deficiency may be a risk factor for a range of diseases. However, the optimal strategies to achieve and maintain vitamin D adequacy (sun exposure, vitamin D supplementation or both), and whether sun exposure itself has benefits over and above initiating synthesis of vitamin D, remain unclear. The Sun Exposure and Vitamin D Supplementation (SEDS) Study aims to compare the effectiveness of sun exposure and vitamin D supplementation for the management of vitamin D insufficiency, and to test whether these management strategies differentially affect markers of immune and cardio-metabolic function. The SEDS Study is a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of two different daily doses of vitamin D supplementation, and placebo, in conjunction with guidance on two different patterns of sun exposure. Participants recruited from across Australia are aged 18-64 years and have a recent vitamin D test result showing a serum 25(OH)D level of 40-60 nmol/L. This paper discusses the rationale behind the study design, and considers the challenges but necessity of data collection within a non-institutionalised adult population, in order to address the study aims. We also discuss the challenges of participant recruitment and retention, ongoing engagement of referring medical practitioners and address issues of compliance and participant retention. Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12613000290796 Registered 14 March 2013. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 17% |
Australia | 2 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
Germany | 2 | 11% |
Canada | 2 | 11% |
Mexico | 1 | 6% |
Djibouti | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 94% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 143 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 33 | 23% |
Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
Researcher | 13 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
Other | 22 | 15% |
Unknown | 37 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 31% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
Other | 20 | 14% |
Unknown | 42 | 29% |