↓ Skip to main content

Detection of bat coronaviruses from Miniopterus fuliginosus in Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Virus Genes, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 1,012)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Detection of bat coronaviruses from Miniopterus fuliginosus in Japan
Published in
Virus Genes, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11262-011-0661-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazuya Shirato, Ken Maeda, Shumpei Tsuda, Kazuo Suzuki, Shumpei Watanabe, Hiroshi Shimoda, Naoya Ueda, Koichiro Iha, Satoshi Taniguchi, Shigeru Kyuwa, Daiji Endoh, Shutoku Matsuyama, Ichiro Kurane, Masayuki Saijo, Shigeru Morikawa, Yasuhiro Yoshikawa, Hiroomi Akashi, Tetsuya Mizutani

Abstract

Bats have great potential as reservoirs for emerging viruses such as severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus. In this study, bat coronaviruses (BtCoVs) were detected by RT-PCR from intestinal and fecal specimens of Miniopterus fuliginosus breeding colonies in Wakayama Prefecture caves, where we previously identified bat betaherpesvirus 2. Two primer sets were used for the detection of BtCoV: one was for the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) region and the other was for the spike (S) protein region. Eleven and 73% of intestinal and fecal specimens, respectively, were positive for RdRp region, and 2 and 40% of those were positive for S protein region. Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis showed that the detected BtCoV belonged to the group 1 (alpha) coronaviruses. These data suggest that BtCoV is endemic in M. fuliginosus in Japan.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
China 1 2%
Unknown 56 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 28%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Master 9 15%
Professor 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 10 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,434,388
of 23,956,119 outputs
Outputs from Virus Genes
#13
of 1,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,875
of 126,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virus Genes
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,956,119 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.