↓ Skip to main content

Effects of resistance training and protein plus amino acid supplementation on muscle anabolism, mass, and strength

Overview of attention for chapter
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 1,614)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
10 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
357 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Chapter title
Effects of resistance training and protein plus amino acid supplementation on muscle anabolism, mass, and strength
Published in
Amino Acids, September 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00726-006-0398-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. S. Willoughby, J. R. Stout, C. D. Wilborn

Abstract

This study examined 10 wks of resistance training and the ingestion of supplemental protein and amino acids on muscle performance and markers of muscle anabolism. Nineteen untrained males were randomly assigned to supplement groups containing either 20 g protein (14 g whey and casein protein, 6 g free amino acids) or 20 g dextrose placebo ingested 1 h before and after exercise for a total of 40 g/d. Participants exercised 4 times/wk using 3 sets of 6-8 repetitions at 85-90% of the one repetition maximum. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). The protein supplement resulted in greater increases in total body mass, fat-free mass, thigh mass, muscle strength, serum IGF-1, IGF-1 mRNA, MHC I and IIa expression, and myofibrillar protein. Ten-wks of resistance training with 20 g protein and amino acids ingested 1 h before and after exercise is more effective than carbohydrate placebo in up-regulating markers of muscle protein synthesis and anabolism along with subsequent improvements in muscle performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 341 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 20%
Student > Bachelor 69 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 11%
Researcher 31 9%
Student > Postgraduate 21 6%
Other 60 17%
Unknown 67 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 84 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 53 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 6%
Other 37 10%
Unknown 74 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2023.
All research outputs
#737,600
of 25,085,000 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#32
of 1,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,065
of 81,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,085,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.