↓ Skip to main content

Production of nattokinase by high cell density fed-batch culture of Bacillus subtilis

Overview of attention for article published in Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Production of nattokinase by high cell density fed-batch culture of Bacillus subtilis
Published in
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00449-011-0527-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eun-Yeong Kwon, Kyung Mi Kim, Mi Kyoung Kim, In Young Lee, Beom Soo Kim

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Student > Master 10 19%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 21%
Chemical Engineering 4 8%
Engineering 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 11 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering
#2
of 8 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,088
of 119,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them