↓ Skip to main content

Simulating the task-level control of human motion: a methodology and framework for implementation

Overview of attention for article published in The Visual Computer, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Simulating the task-level control of human motion: a methodology and framework for implementation
Published in
The Visual Computer, June 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00371-005-0284-4
Authors

Vincent De Sapio, James Warren, Oussama Khatib, Scott Delp

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
Germany 1 1%
France 1 1%
Ukraine 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 69 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 41%
Researcher 16 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 47 59%
Computer Science 14 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Mathematics 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 8 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from The Visual Computer
#169
of 1,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,906
of 58,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Visual Computer
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,264 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.