↓ Skip to main content

Quasispecies: From Theory to Experimental Systems

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 483: Fidelity Variants and RNA Quasispecies
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Fidelity Variants and RNA Quasispecies
Chapter number 483
Book title
Quasispecies: From Theory to Experimental Systems
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/82_2015_483
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-923897-5, 978-3-31-923898-2
Authors

Antonio V. Bordería, Kathryn Rozen-Gagnon, Marco Vignuzzi, Bordería, Antonio V., Rozen-Gagnon, Kathryn, Vignuzzi, Marco

Abstract

By now, it is well established that the error rate of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) that replicates RNA virus genomes is a primary driver of the mutation frequencies observed in RNA virus populations-the basis for the RNA quasispecies. Over the last 10 years, a considerable amount of work has uncovered the molecular determinants of replication fidelity in this enzyme. The isolation of high- and low-fidelity variants for several RNA viruses, in an expanding number of viral families, provides evidence that nature has optimized the fidelity to facilitate genetic diversity and adaptation, while maintaining genetic integrity and infectivity. This chapter will provide an overview of what fidelity variants tell us about RNA virus biology and how they may be used in antiviral approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 71 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 22%
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 16 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 19 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,658,800
of 24,701,594 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#114
of 708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,679
of 290,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.