↓ Skip to main content

Quasispecies: From Theory to Experimental Systems

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 454: The Nucleation of Semantic Information in Prebiotic Matter
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Nucleation of Semantic Information in Prebiotic Matter
Chapter number 454
Book title
Quasispecies: From Theory to Experimental Systems
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/82_2015_454
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-923897-5, 978-3-31-923898-2
Authors

Bernd-Olaf Küppers, Küppers, Bernd-Olaf

Abstract

The analysis of the inherent context-dependence of genetic information suggests that there are evolutionary mechanisms which are independent of the processes of environmental adaptation and yet are able to push prebiotic matter towards functional complexity. In this regard, the extension of information space, by random prolongation of the primary structure of biological macromolecules, must have played a decisive role in the origin of life. On the one hand, the extension of information space is tantamount to an increase in the syntactic complexity of potential information carriers, which in turn is a prerequisite for the nucleation and evolution of semantic information. On the other hand, the increase in the dimensionality of information space expands the number of possible pathways of evolutionary optimisation and thereby improves the possible choices that can be made by progressive evolution. Alongside the optimisation of evolutionary optimisation itself, there are principles of evolutionary dynamics that direct the formation of functional order in prebiotic matter. Since these principles are constitutive for the proto-semantics of genetic information, they may be regarded as the elements of the semantic code of evolution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 25%
Researcher 2 25%
Other 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2024.
All research outputs
#20,806,838
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#555
of 707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,653
of 360,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#29
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.