↓ Skip to main content

Coping with Favoritism in Recruitment and Selection: A Communal Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
Coping with Favoritism in Recruitment and Selection: A Communal Perspective
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10551-018-4094-9
Authors

Jasper Hotho, Dana Minbaeva, Maral Muratbekova-Touron, Larissa Rabbiosi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 151 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Researcher 7 5%
Lecturer 6 4%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 75 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 37 25%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Computer Science 6 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 76 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,853,337
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#808
of 3,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,014
of 447,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#10
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.