↓ Skip to main content

The Relationship Between Polygenic Risk Scores and Cognition in Schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Schizophrenia Bulletin, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Relationship Between Polygenic Risk Scores and Cognition in Schizophrenia
Published in
Schizophrenia Bulletin, June 2019
DOI 10.1093/schbul/sbz061
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander L Richards, Antonio F Pardiñas, Aura Frizzati, Katherine E Tansey, Amy J Lynham, Peter Holmans, Sophie E Legge, Jeanne E Savage, Ingrid Agartz, Ole A Andreassen, Gabriella A M Blokland, Aiden Corvin, Donna Cosgrove, Franziska Degenhardt, Srdjan Djurovic, Thomas Espeseth, Laura Ferraro, Charlotte Gayer-Anderson, Ina Giegling, Neeltje E van Haren, Annette M Hartmann, John J Hubert, Erik G Jönsson, Bettina Konte, Leonhard Lennertz, Loes M Olde Loohuis, Ingrid Melle, Craig Morgan, Derek W Morris, Robin M Murray, Håkan Nyman, Roel A Ophoff, Jim van Os, Tracey L Petryshen, Diego Quattrone, Marcella Rietschel, Dan Rujescu, Bart P F Rutten, Fabian Streit, Jana Strohmaier, Patrick F Sullivan, Kjetil Sundet, Michael Wagner, Valentina Escott-Price, Michael J Owen, Gary Donohoe, Michael C O’Donovan, James T R Walters

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 143 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 45 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 14%
Psychology 18 13%
Neuroscience 14 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 57 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#5,160,501
of 25,260,058 outputs
Outputs from Schizophrenia Bulletin
#1,254
of 3,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,602
of 358,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Schizophrenia Bulletin
#23
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,260,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.